<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VM-Aware &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vm-aware.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vm-aware.com</link>
	<description>Server, Storage &#38; Application Virtualisation!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Exchange 2007 Sizing Chart</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/microsoft-exchange-2007-sizing-chart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/microsoft-exchange-2007-sizing-chart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very nice article regarding Exchange 2007 server sizing can be found here at msexchange.org.
It talks about how to size depending on the amount of mailboxes, mailstores and users.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very nice article regarding Exchange 2007 server sizing can be found <a title="Exchange 2007 Sizing Chart" href="http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2007/planning-architecture/exchange-2007-sizing-cheat-sheet.html" target="_blank">here</a> at <a title="MSExchange" href="http://www.msexchange.org/" target="_blank">msexchange.org</a>.</p>
<p>It talks about how to size depending on the amount of mailboxes, mailstores and users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/microsoft-exchange-2007-sizing-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualising Office 2007 In 30 Steps</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/virtualising-office-2007-in-30-steps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/virtualising-office-2007-in-30-steps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Madden has created an article that walks you through using Microsoft&#8217;s SoftGrid product to sequence or virtualise Microsoft Office 2007 in 30 easy to follow steps.
It is worth a read even if you don&#8217;t own SoftGrid as the concepts can be applied to other Application Virtualisation products. I used the section about tweaking the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Madden has created an article that walks you through using Microsoft&#8217;s SoftGrid product to sequence or virtualise Microsoft Office 2007 in 30 easy to follow steps.</p>
<p>It is worth a read even if you don&#8217;t own SoftGrid as the concepts can be applied to other Application Virtualisation products. I used the section about tweaking the virtual registry (step 24in ThinApp and it worked a treat.</p>
<p>Read it here. Thanks Brian!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/virtualising-office-2007-in-30-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed Up Windows (VMs &amp; Physical)</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/speed-up-windows-vms-physical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/speed-up-windows-vms-physical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve found a multitude of blogs that point out that significant performance enhancements can be attained by disabling the File Last Access Time Check registry key in Windows Server 200x&#38; XP.
I tried it and it does indeed make a difference, but don&#8217;t just take my word for it as Microsoft have disabled it by default [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found a multitude of blogs that point out that significant performance enhancements can be attained by disabling the File Last Access Time Check registry key in Windows Server 200x&amp; XP.</p>
<p>I tried it and it does indeed make a difference, but don&#8217;t just take my word for it as Microsoft have disabled it by default in Vista &amp; 2008.</p>
<p>Check out these blogs for various discussions about it:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="How To Geek" href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows/speed-up-disk-access-by-disabling-last-access-updating-in-windows-xp/" target="_blank">How To Geek</a></li>
<li><a title="FileCAB" href="http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/archive/2006/11/07/disabling-last-access-time-in-windows-vista-to-improve-ntfs-performance.aspx" target="_blank">Microsoft CAB Site</a></li>
<li><a title="PCTools" href="http://www.pctools.com/guides/registry/detail/50/" target="_blank">PCTools</a></li>
<li><a title="VMwareInfo" href="http://www.vmwareinfo.com/2008/07/speed-up-your-windows-2003-servers.html" target="_blank">VMwareInfo</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Give it a go, unless of course you run an application that depends on this parameter being updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/speed-up-windows-vms-physical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Product Licensing Clarified</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/microsoft-product-licensing-clarified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/microsoft-product-licensing-clarified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I stumbled across this great pdf, call it Microsoft Licensing for Dummies or whatever you want, but it has a great breakdown of how licensing should be undertaken to be fully legit.

Server &#38; CAL Licensing
Enterprise CAL Suite
Core CAL Suite
Server Licensing
Licensing Exchange Server

It even has a stab at Sharepoint, but I think that this is better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stumbled across this great <a title="Microsft Licensing Explained" href="https://partner.microsoft.com/UK/40046610" target="_blank">pdf</a>, call it Microsoft Licensing for Dummies or whatever you want, but it has a great breakdown of how licensing should be undertaken to be fully legit.</p>
<ul>
<li>Server &amp; CAL Licensing</li>
<li>Enterprise CAL Suite</li>
<li>Core CAL Suite</li>
<li>Server Licensing</li>
<li>Licensing Exchange Server</li>
</ul>
<p>It even has a stab at Sharepoint, but I think that this is better handled by reading one of my earlier <a title="Sharepoint for Dummies" href="http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/27/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-licensing-for-dummies/" target="_blank">posts</a>.  Thanks to <a title="VINF" href="http://vinf.net" target="_blank">vinf.net</a> for the original spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/microsoft-product-licensing-clarified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server Bottlenecks</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/sql-server-bottlenecks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/sql-server-bottlenecks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The guys over at PSS SQL Blog have written a short but really sweet article about how to really detect whether you have a bottleneck with SQL Server implementations.
It gives a few pointers of what to look for if you really start digging including:

PAGE I/O Waits (select * from sys.dm_os_wait_stats where wait_type like &#8216;%PAGEIO%&#8217;)
Virtual File [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys over at <a title="PSS SQL" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/" target="_blank">PSS SQL Blog</a> have written a short but really sweet <a title="SQL Server Bottlenecks" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2008/07/08/sql-server-i-o-bottleneck-i-don-t-have-one-yes-you-do.aspx" target="_blank">article</a> about how to really detect whether you have a bottleneck with SQL Server implementations.</p>
<p>It gives a few pointers of what to look for if you really start digging including:</p>
<ul>
<li>PAGE I/O Waits (select * from sys.dm_os_wait_stats where wait_type like &#8216;%PAGEIO%&#8217;)</li>
<li>Virtual File Stats (select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats(-1, -1))</li>
<li>Stalled I/O Warnings</li>
<li>Additional disk based performance counters and available hardware utilities</li>
</ul>
<p>I found this useful recently when SQL Server was virtualised and all other methods of monitoring looked fine (perfmon, vCharter), but couldn&#8217;t find the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/sql-server-bottlenecks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerShell Active Directory Cmdlets</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/powershell-active-directory-cmdlets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/powershell-active-directory-cmdlets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a bunch of great cmdlets that have now been bundled into the free Quest ActiveRoles Management Shell for Active Directory package.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a bunch of great cmdlets that have now been bundled into the free Quest ActiveRoles Management Shell for Active Directory package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/powershell-active-directory-cmdlets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office Sharepoint Server Licensing For Dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-licensing-for-dummies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-licensing-for-dummies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharepoint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been on a bit of a mission of late to find articles that make the sometimes complex seem more simple.
I don&#8217;t know about you, but I find navigating around the Sharepoint licensing model a complete and utter nightmare.  So how pleased was I when I found Lady Licensing.  Simple diagrams covering the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been on a bit of a mission of late to find articles that make the sometimes complex seem more simple.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I find navigating around the Sharepoint licensing model a complete and utter nightmare.  So how pleased was I when I found <a title="Sharepoint Licensing" href="http://ladylicensing.spaces.live.com/Blog" target="_blank">Lady Licensing</a>.  Simple diagrams covering the following scenarios:</p>
<ul>
<li>Intranet Portal</li>
<li>Intranet/Extranet</li>
<li>Internet</li>
</ul>
<p>Brilliant!  It even comes with pictures.  Need I say more?  I thought not, check it out <a title="Sharepoint Licensing" href="http://ladylicensing.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!87F95F1B5B21B01E!575.entry" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/microsoft-office-sharepoint-server-licensing-for-dummies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerShell v2 To Ship Mid 2009?!?</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-v2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-v2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you that are interested in PowerShell to the point that you&#8217;d be curious as a possible release date then Jeffrey Snover may be your man.
A blog post of his indicates that v2 is feature complete and although he cannot explicitly mention a release date he intimates that mid 2009 is a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you that are interested in PowerShell to the point that you&#8217;d be curious as a possible release date then Jeffrey Snover may be your man.</p>
<p>A blog <a title="PowerShell v2" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/06/17/when-will-powershell-v2-ship.aspx" target="_blank">post</a> of his indicates that v2 is feature complete and although he cannot explicitly mention a release date he intimates that mid 2009 is a good guess.</p>
<p>I think PowerShell is the best thing that Microsoft have done for many a year so I&#8217;m pretty excited by a big feature update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-v2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerShell For Dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-for-dummies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-for-dummies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 09:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powershell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know about you, but not being a programmer means I sometimes struggle with some of the concepts.  I hope you find this article by Jeffry Snover over at the MSDN PowerShell blog as useful as me.
It gives a very nice analogy of how you can equate objects and their functions to riding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but not being a programmer means I sometimes struggle with some of the concepts.  I hope you find this <a title="PowerShell For Dummies" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/archive/2008/06/17/explaining-objects-to-non-programmers.aspx" target="_blank">article</a> by Jeffry Snover over at the <a title="PowerShell Blog" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/powershell/">MSDN PowerShell</a> blog as useful as me.</p>
<p>It gives a very nice analogy of how you can equate objects and their functions to riding a bike.</p>
<p>Nice and simple, just how I like my explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/powershell-for-dummies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customising RDP Dialogs</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/customising-rdp-dialogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/customising-rdp-dialogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Terminal Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RDP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firstly, let me start by saying that not everyone is going to want to &#8216;tweak&#8217; with the bowels of RDP, but if you are so inclined then check out this article.
I stumbled upon it when wondering how I could get people to stop simply disconnecting sessions and logging off properly.
The article helps you to change [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, let me start by saying that not everyone is going to want to &#8216;tweak&#8217; with the bowels of RDP, but if you are so inclined then check out this <a title="ResHack RDP" href="http://www.msterminalservices.org/articles/Customizing-Microsoft-RDP-Client-Part1.html" target="_blank">article</a>.</p>
<p>I stumbled upon it when wondering how I could get people to stop simply disconnecting sessions and logging off properly.<span id="more-129"></span></p>
<p>The article helps you to change the disconnect dialog from looking like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.msterminalservices.org/img/upl/image0081152628972883.jpg" alt="" width="383" height="186" /></p>
<p>To looking more like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.msterminalservices.org/img/upl/image0091152628972899.jpg" alt="" width="383" height="186" /></p>
<p>As I said at the top of this post, not everyone should be poking around with this kind of thing in production, but it is very very handy for persistent offenders.</p>
<p>This tool obviously has many uses beyond RDP dialog customisation, so use your imagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/06/customising-rdp-dialogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

