<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VM-Aware &#187; Hyper-V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vm-aware.com/tag/hyper-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vm-aware.com</link>
	<description>Server, Storage &#38; Application Virtualisation!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VMware Is Best&#8230; According To VMware &amp; Me!</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/vmware-is-best-according-to-vmware-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/vmware-is-best-according-to-vmware-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware recently published an article on the Virtual Reality blog that raises some interesting points as to why VMware is better than Xen &#38; Hyper-V.
Some of the areas that get particular analysis are:

Uptime
Direct driver model
Memory management

More interesting still are some of the comments to post, have clearly been made by Citrix &#38; Microsoft employees or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware recently published an <a title="VMware Is Best" href="http://blogs.vmware.com/virtualreality/2008/06/a-look-at-some.html" target="_blank">article</a> on the <a title="Virtual Reality Blog" href="http://blogs.vmware.com/virtualreality" target="_blank">Virtual Reality</a> blog that raises some interesting points as to why VMware is better than Xen &amp; Hyper-V.</p>
<p>Some of the areas that get particular analysis are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Uptime</li>
<li>Direct driver model</li>
<li>Memory management</li>
</ul>
<p>More interesting still are some of the comments to post, have clearly been made by Citrix &amp; Microsoft employees or people with a vested interest.</p>
<p>I find some of the points amusing, but my 2 penneth worth is thus:</p>
<ul>
<li>No VMotion or equivalent = not production ready</li>
</ul>
<p>I think that this in itself is a good enough reason to use VMware over anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/07/vmware-is-best-according-to-vmware-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Migration &#8211; Way Off Competing</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/04/quick-migration-way-off-competing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/04/quick-migration-way-off-competing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/04/09/quick-migration-way-off-competing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague and I have been pondering on Microsoft&#8217;s Quick Migration technology and wondered when we might find the time to compare it to VMotion.
Well, now we don&#8217;t need to wonder because Mike D has written an excellent article outlining real use cases and points out why Quick Migration simply isn&#8217;t a viable option.
The article [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague and I have been pondering on Microsoft&#8217;s Quick Migration technology and wondered when we might find the time to compare it to VMotion.</p>
<p>Well, now we don&#8217;t need to wonder because Mike D has written an excellent article outlining real use cases and points out why Quick Migration simply isn&#8217;t a viable option.</p>
<p>The article is broken down into two parts and part one can be found here with part two being here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/04/quick-migration-way-off-competing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

