<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VM-Aware &#187; Storage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vm-aware.com/category/storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vm-aware.com</link>
	<description>Server, Storage &#38; Application Virtualisation!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NetApp Releases SnapDrive for Windows 6.3</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/09/netapp-releases-snapdrive-for-windows-6-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/09/netapp-releases-snapdrive-for-windows-6-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NetApp has finally released SnapDrive for Windows 6.3 to GA:
https://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/software/snapdrive_win/6.3/
It includes an amazing bit of functionality in the application consistent snapshots without the need for FC/iSCSI RDMS:

Support for performing Snapshot copy operations on virtual machine disks (VMDKs) in an NFS or VMFS datastore, which requires Virtual Storage Console 2.0.1 or later. Please check the availability [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetApp has finally released SnapDrive for Windows 6.3 to GA:</p>
<p><a href="https://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/software/snapdrive_win/6.3/">https://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/software/snapdrive_win/6.3/</a></p>
<p>It includes an amazing bit of functionality in the application consistent snapshots without the need for FC/iSCSI RDMS:</p>
<ul>
<li>Support for performing Snapshot copy operations on virtual machine disks (VMDKs) in an NFS or VMFS datastore, which requires Virtual Storage Console 2.0.1 or later. Please check the availability of Virtual Storage Console 2.0.1 and install it before using this feature.</li>
<li>Support for space reclamation when using VMDKs in an NFS datastore</li>
<li>Support for DataFabric Manager caching with RBAC</li>
<li>Automatic download of the storage system access control (storacl.exe) tool as part of your SnapDrive 6.3 for Windows installation</li>
</ul>
<p>This will allow us to remove a lot of complexity, just as soon as it supports all the different applications.  There are some considerations &amp; limitations with the VMDK support:</p>
<ul>
<li>SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure 3.0.1 or later (included with Virtual Storage Console 2.0.1) must be installed</li>
<li>Attached VMDKs can only be basic disks</li>
<li>Dynamic disks are not supported</li>
<li>Multiple partitions are not supported</li>
<li>The guest OS must be able to communicate with the IP address or storage system name</li>
<li>configured in the SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure server</li>
<li>VMDKs cannot have multiple mount points</li>
</ul>
<p>For a first iteration I think it is a leap forward.</p>
<p>IAG – <a href="https://now.netapp.com/knowledge/docs/snapdrive/relsnap63/pdfs/admin.pdf">https://now.netapp.com/knowledge/docs/snapdrive/relsnap63/pdfs/admin.pdf</a></p>
<p>Release Notes &#8211; <a href="https://now.netapp.com/knowledge/docs/snapdrive/relsnap63/pdfs/rnote.pdf">https://now.netapp.com/knowledge/docs/snapdrive/relsnap63/pdfs/rnote.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/09/netapp-releases-snapdrive-for-windows-6-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed Up SMVI/VMware Snapshots</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/03/speed-up-smvivmware-snapshots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/03/speed-up-smvivmware-snapshots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 04:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/03/speed-up-smvivmware-snapshots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found that there is a big improvement when running SMVI and selecting the VMware Snapshots option on NFS datastores after adding the following to /etc/vmware/config and rebooting the host:
prefvmx.consolidateDeleteNFSLocks  = “TRUE”
You will know whether it is working because you will see a .lck file appear in the folder containing the vmx file and snapshots [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that there is a big improvement when running SMVI and selecting the VMware Snapshots option on NFS datastores after adding the following to /etc/vmware/config and rebooting the host:</p>
<p><em>prefvmx.consolidateDeleteNFSLocks  = “TRUE”</em></p>
<p>You will know whether it is working because you will see a .lck file appear in the folder containing the vmx file and snapshots should be opened and closed more quickly (try opening a ping to the VM being snapshotted and see if you lose fewer after making the change).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2010/03/speed-up-smvivmware-snapshots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Brocade SFP Swindle!</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/11/the-great-brocade-sfp-swindle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/11/the-great-brocade-sfp-swindle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fibre Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently completed a 2GB SAN Fabric upgrade to 8GB on Brocade switches and came across two issues.
The biggest issue and the one that caused me greatest consternation was the fact that Brocade have hard-coded all the new FC switches to accept only Brocade branded SFP modules.  Now this isn&#8217;t that big a problem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have recently completed a 2GB SAN Fabric upgrade to 8GB on Brocade switches and came across two issues.</p>
<p>The biggest issue and the one that caused me greatest consternation was the fact that Brocade have hard-coded all the new FC switches to accept only Brocade branded SFP modules.  Now this isn&#8217;t that big a problem for your shortwave connections due to the fact that the SFP modules you already own are probably not 8GB capable so you&#8217;ll have ordered new SFP modules at the same time as ordering the switch.  However, it is entirely feasible that any Longwave SFP modules you currently own are 4GB capable (which is equivalent speed to any Brocade LW SFPs) and thought you might be able to reutilise them and save a few grand.  You can&#8217;t!</p>
<p>Basically if you issue an SFP show command and any of the SFP Modules are listed as anything other than BROCADE under the Vendor ID, then they will not work in the new 8GB FC Switches.</p>
<p>The second issue is actually an IBM related problem and if you have ordered the SAN24B (8GB) Express then it doesn&#8217;t come with the capability of using E-Ports (ISLs).  I found this out the hard way as well, so save yourself a lot of irritation and don&#8217;t order the &#8216;Express&#8217; version of the any of the new IBM 8GB fibre switches because in the long run there is nothing express about them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/11/the-great-brocade-sfp-swindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NetApp SnapManager VI 2.0 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-snapmanager-vi-2-0-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-snapmanager-vi-2-0-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NetApp have finally released the latest and greatest version of their SnapManager for VI product.
An essential addition to any infrastructure running both VMware &#38; NetApp it allows guaranteed crash consistent versions of Virtual Machines to be replicated to secondary sights.
New functionality and enhancements include:

Singe file restore (SFR)
A single wizard for creating manual and scheduled backup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetApp have finally released the latest and greatest version of their SnapManager for VI product.</p>
<p>An essential addition to any infrastructure running both VMware &amp; NetApp it allows guaranteed crash consistent versions of Virtual Machines to be replicated to secondary sights.</p>
<p>New functionality and enhancements include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Singe file restore (SFR)</li>
<li>A single wizard for creating manual and scheduled backup jobs</li>
<li>New backup job options:
<ul>
<li>The ability to include independent disks</li>
<li>The ability to exclude specified datastores</li>
<li>The ability to trigger prebackup or postbackup scripts per backup job (the scripts must be in the server/scripts folder on the SMVI server before you can select them in the SnapManager 2.0 for Virtual Infrastructure user interface)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>An advanced find option to search for specific backup jobs:
<ul>
<li>Most recent backup (default)</li>
<li>Backups within a specified time period</li>
<li>Backups that include VMware snapshots</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>New restore granularity option (besides SFR):
<ul>
<li>VMDKs</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>So a lot going on here and certainly worth the wait.  You can grab a copy now from the <a title="NOW" href="http://now.netapp.com">NOW</a> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-snapmanager-vi-2-0-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NetApp Release Virtual Storage Console</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-release-virtual-storage-console/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-release-virtual-storage-console/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NetApp have released the  eagerly anticipated Virtual Storage Console:

http://blogs.netapp.com/storage_nuts_n_bolts/2009/10/netapp-virtual-storage-console-vsc-for-esx-ready-for-download.html

It does  a lot of useful things for a 1.0 release, but probably the most important are  the remediation options for the following:


Storage adapter timeouts
Multipathing settings
NFS settings
Guest OS disk timeout values
Correct misaligned disk partitions


It is available for vSphere ESX &#38; ESXi right now from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- P { 	MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px } BODY { 	SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #010101; SCROLLBAR-DARKSHADOW-COLOR: #fafafa; SCROLLBAR-BASE-COLOR: #f7f7f7; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #cecfce; SCROLLBAR-TRACK-COLOR: #fffbff } SPAN#misspelled { 	PADDING-BOTTOM: 1px; BACKGROUND: url(8.1.336.0/themes/base/squiggly.gif) repeat-x 50% bottom } --></p>
<div dir="ltr">NetApp have released the  eagerly anticipated Virtual Storage Console:</div>
<p dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><a href="http://blogs.netapp.com/storage_nuts_n_bolts/2009/10/netapp-virtual-storage-console-vsc-for-esx-ready-for-download.html">http://blogs.netapp.com/storage_nuts_n_bolts/2009/10/netapp-virtual-storage-console-vsc-for-esx-ready-for-download.html</a></div>
<p dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">It does  a lot of useful things for a 1.0 release, but probably the most important are  the remediation options for the following:</div>
<div dir="ltr">
<ul>
<li>Storage adapter timeouts</li>
<li>Multipathing settings</li>
<li>NFS settings</li>
<li>Guest OS disk timeout values</li>
<li>Correct misaligned disk partitions</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">It is available for vSphere ESX &amp; ESXi right now from the <a title="NOW" href="http://now.netapp.com">NOW</a> site.  I will be providing more information on this useful utility very soon.</div>
<p dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">Enjoy!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/10/netapp-release-virtual-storage-console/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCoE Standard Ratified</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/06/fcoe-standard-ratified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/06/fcoe-standard-ratified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been confirmed that FCoE has been ratified as a standard by T11.
I&#8217;m personally very excited, because I work with a lot of NetApp kit and NetApp are one of the very early adopters of FCoE, so I should be getting my hand on some exciting new kit soon.
If you want to read the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been confirmed that FCoE has been ratified as a standard by T11.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally very excited, because I work with a lot of NetApp kit and NetApp are one of the very early adopters of FCoE, so I should be getting my hand on some exciting new kit soon.</p>
<p>If you want to read the T11 paper confirming the standard, then check it out here:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.t11.org/ftp/t11/pub/fc/bb-5/09-056v5.pdf">http://www.t11.org/ftp/t11/pub/fc/bb-5/09-056v5.pdf</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/06/fcoe-standard-ratified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware Announces Top Rated Sessions</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/vmware-announces-top-rated-sessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/vmware-announces-top-rated-sessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMware have just announced the 10 highest rated sessions that will be repeated this afternoon (Thursday).  Here&#8217;s the list in order:
#1 &#8211; TA01 &#8211; Managing VMware With PowerShell
#2 &#8211; DV02 &#8211; VDI versus Terminal Services
#3 &#8211; AP02 &#8211; Best Practices for Deploying Sharepoint/MOSS 2007 on VMware Infrastructure
#4 &#8211; AP11 &#8211; Performance Best Practices
#5 &#8211; DC21 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMware have just announced the 10 highest rated sessions that will be repeated this afternoon (Thursday).  Here&#8217;s the list in order:</p>
<p>#1 &#8211; TA01 &#8211; Managing VMware With PowerShell<br />
#2 &#8211; DV02 &#8211; VDI versus Terminal Services<br />
#3 &#8211; AP02 &#8211; Best Practices for Deploying Sharepoint/MOSS 2007 on VMware Infrastructure<br />
#4 &#8211; AP11 &#8211; Performance Best Practices<br />
#5 &#8211; DC21 &#8211; VMware &#8211; Standardised Platform Provisioning<br />
#6 &#8211; AP01 &#8211; Best Practice for Successfully Virtualising Active Directory<br />
#7 &#8211; DV07 &#8211; Server &amp; Storage Sizing for VMware View<br />
#8 &#8211; AP05 &#8211; SQL Server Performance on VMware: est Practices, Recommendations, Tuning &amp; Troubleshooting<br />
#9 &#8211; TA11 &#8211; Best Practices to Increase Availability &amp; Throughput for the Future of VMware<br />
#10 &#8211; TP12 &#8211; Consolidation of Performance Sensitive Applications</p>
<p>I managed to see most of these, but missed a few, so I will be getting in there if I can.  Check this photo <a title="Top Rated Sessions" href="http://www.vm-aware.com/wp-content/gallery/vmworld-europe-2009/Top_Rated_Sessions.JPG" target="_blank">here</a> to see what is repeated when and where.</p>
<p>I can highly recommend Brian Madden&#8217;s presentation (#2) as I saw it first time round and it was great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/vmware-announces-top-rated-sessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brocade New Features</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/brocade-new-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/brocade-new-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brocade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCenter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone that implements Brocades SANs on a semi-regular basis, I thought I&#8217;d stop by their stand and see if they had anything interesting on show and it turns out they did.
The project I am currently working on has a number of Brocade fabrics (4) after adding 3 new ones and managing them would have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone that implements Brocades SANs on a semi-regular basis, I thought I&#8217;d stop by their stand and see if they had anything interesting on show and it turns out they did.</p>
<p>The project I am currently working on has a number of Brocade fabrics (4) after adding 3 new ones and managing them would have been a pain if not for <a title="Brocade Data Center Fabric Manager" href="http://www.brocade.com/downloads/documents/data_sheets/product_data_sheets/DCFM_DS_00.pdf" target="_blank">Data Center Fabric Manger</a>.  However, there is one massive limitation with DCFM and that&#8217;s the free version only manages a single fabric.  &#8216;What do you expect for free?&#8217; I hear you cry, well I expect the jump up from the free version to be a bit more incremental than it currently is.  If you want to upgrade you can, to the Enterprise, which will cost you a substantial £30k list.  Now this is not bad if you push Enterprise to its limits (1000 ports in a single fabric), but what if you only have 200 ports?  well Brocade have obviously noticed this discrepency and are releasing a middle level version and are hoping to release in the next few months.</p>
<p>Something else of interest was the vCenter plugin that connects directly with Data Centere Fabric Manager and can trigger actions within vCenter based on policies set at the fabric level.  If an HBA&#8217;s bandwidth becomes saturated, a policy can send an alert to vCenter to move it to a host with greater HBA bandwidth availability.</p>
<p>All very neat stuff and the demo worked, so check it out if you deal with Brocade kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2009/02/brocade-new-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A-SIS or FlexClone or Both?</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/a-sis-or-flexclone-or-both/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/a-sis-or-flexclone-or-both/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetApp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Lowe has written an article that discusses the pros &#38; cons of FlexClone &#38; A-SIS when used in conjunction with a VMware environment.
If you are just getting to grips with these technolgies (like me) it is a very useful starting point to understand how the two technologies may work with VMware.
I was investigating it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Scott Lowe" href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/" target="_blank">Scott Lowe</a> has written an <a title="FlexClone &amp; A-SIS with VMware" href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/08/05/flexclones-versus-deduplication-with-vmware-infrastructure/" target="_blank">article</a> that discusses the pros &amp; cons of <a title="FlexClone" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/platform-os/flexclone.html" target="_blank">FlexClone</a> &amp; <a title="A-SIS" href="http://www.netapp.com/us/products/platform-os/dedupe.html" target="_blank">A-SIS</a> when used in conjunction with a VMware environment.</p>
<p>If you are just getting to grips with these technolgies (like me) it is a very useful starting point to understand how the two technologies may work with VMware.</p>
<p>I was investigating it when used with VMware VDI so there are a few very useful tips indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/a-sis-or-flexclone-or-both/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Alerts For DataCore SANMelody NMV</title>
		<link>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/email-alerts-for-datacore-sanmelody-nmv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/email-alerts-for-datacore-sanmelody-nmv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DataCore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vm-aware.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a fantastic article that talks about a free method of monitoring the event viewer for NMV related warnings.  I know this functionality should be included in the product, but until it is try using blat as described in this article.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a fantastic <a title="NMV Alerts" href="http://sanmelody.blogspot.com/2008/06/e-mail-alerts-for-sanmelody.html" target="_blank">article</a> that talks about a free method of monitoring the event viewer for NMV related warnings.  I know this functionality should be included in the product, but until it is try using blat as described in this <a title="NMV Alerts" href="http://sanmelody.blogspot.com/2008/06/e-mail-alerts-for-sanmelody.html" target="_blank">article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vm-aware.com/2008/08/email-alerts-for-datacore-sanmelody-nmv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

